Assessments in UK Education: Do They Help or Hinder Young Learners?
- j-us-teducation
- Mar 11
- 3 min read
Ah, assessments. The very word can strike fear into the hearts of students, parents, and even teachers. From the dreaded SATs to the ever-evolving phonics screening checks, assessments are a staple of the UK education system. But why do we have them, how have they changed over the years, and do they actually help children learn? Let’s take a dive into the wonderful (and sometimes stressful) world of assessments in education.
A Brief History of Assessments – How Did We Get Here?
Assessments in UK education have been around for centuries, though they haven’t always looked the way they do today. Back in the Victorian era, education was largely for the privileged, and assessments were used to separate those who would go on to university from those destined for the workforce.
Fast forward to the 20th century, and we see the rise of national standardised testing. The 1944 Education Act made schooling free for all children and introduced the Eleven Plus exam, which determined whether a child would go to a grammar school, a secondary modern, or a technical school.
Then came the National Curriculum in 1988, which brought about Standard Assessment Tests (SATs) for primary school pupils. The idea was to monitor progress and keep schools accountable, ensuring that children across the country were learning at a consistent level.
Over time, the types of assessments used have evolved, with phonics screening checks introduced in 2012 and baseline assessments for Reception children making their debut in 2021.
How Have Assessments Changed?
Assessments have gone from being high-stakes, make-or-break exams to a mix of formal testing and teacher assessments. The government has tinkered with them over the years, sometimes making them stricter, other times loosening the reins. The 11+ exam still exists in some areas, but most children in the UK now follow a more comprehensive school system.
Today, primary school children face several key assessments:
Early Years Foundation Stage (EYFS) assessments – Checking development milestones for under-fives.
Phonics Screening Check (Year 1) – Testing reading ability through phonics decoding.
Key Stage 1 SATs (Year 2) – Assessing maths and English (though these will soon become optional).
Multiplication Tables Check (Year 4) – Testing times tables knowledge.
Key Stage 2 SATs (Year 6) – Assessing maths, reading, and grammar before secondary school.
Over time, there’s been debate about whether these tests are necessary or too stressful for young learners. Some argue they provide valuable insights into progress, while others believe they put unnecessary pressure on children.
The Impact of Assessments on Young Learners (0-11 Years)
When it comes to children under 11, assessments can be a double-edged sword. On the one hand, they help teachers understand how well pupils are doing and identify those who may need extra support. On the other, the pressure to perform well—especially in SATs—can be overwhelming for some children, leading to stress and anxiety at a young age.
For the youngest children (0-5 years), assessments tend to be more observational, focusing on development rather than right or wrong answers. But as children move through primary school, the emphasis on test scores increases. This can lead to a narrowed curriculum where teachers focus more on test-related subjects, sometimes at the expense of creativity, play, and broader learning experiences.
Do Assessments Actually Help Children Learn?
This is the million-pound question. Do assessments actually make children better learners? The answer isn’t straightforward.
The positives:
Assessments can highlight gaps in knowledge and allow for targeted support.
They help teachers and schools measure progress and effectiveness.
Some children thrive under structured assessments and enjoy the challenge.
The negatives:
Test-focused learning can limit creativity and reduce the enjoyment of education.
High-pressure assessments can cause anxiety and negatively impact self-esteem.
Not all children learn at the same pace, and some may be unfairly judged by a one-size-fits-all system.
Ultimately, assessments in education are a tool. When used correctly—without excessive pressure and with a focus on improving learning rather than just measuring it—they can be helpful. However, when they become the be-all and end-all of education, they risk doing more harm than good.
The Verdict
So, do assessments improve a child’s ability to learn? They can, but only if they’re used in a supportive and well-balanced way. Learning isn’t just about passing tests—it’s about curiosity, creativity, and confidence.
While assessments can provide useful insights, they shouldn’t be the only measure of a child’s progress.
Perhaps the best approach is one that values assessments as part of a broader, more holistic education—one that recognises that children are more than just a test score. And who knows? Maybe one day, we’ll find an even better way to track progress without the stress and pressure of formal testing. Until then, let’s keep the conversation going and ensure we’re doing what’s best for our young learners!





Comments